n February 1982 the
secular Syrian government of President Hafez al-Assad faced a mortal
threat from Islamic extremists, who sought to topple the Assad
regime. How did it respond? President Assad identified the rebellion
as emanating from Syria's fourth-largest city — Hama — and he
literally leveled it, pounding the fundamentalist neighborhoods with
artillery for days. Once the guns fell silent, he plowed up the
rubble and bulldozed it flat, into vast parking lots. Amnesty
International estimated that 10,000 to 25,000 Syrians, mostly
civilians, were killed in the merciless crackdown. Syria has not had
a Muslim extremist problem since.
I visited Hama a few months after it was leveled. The regime
actually wanted Syrians to go see it, to contemplate Hama's silence
and to reflect on its meaning. I wrote afterward, "The whole town
looked as though a tornado had swept back and forth over it for a
week — but this was not the work of mother nature."
This was "Hama Rules" — the real rules of Middle East politics —
and Hama Rules are no rules at all. I tell this story not to suggest
this should be America's approach. We can't go around leveling
cities. We need to be much more focused, selective and smart in
uprooting the terrorists.
No, I tell this story because it's important that we understand
that Syria, Egypt, Algeria and Tunisia have all faced Islamist
threats and crushed them without mercy or Miranda rights. Part of
the problem America now faces is actually the fallout from these
crackdowns. Three things happened:
First, once the fundamentalists were crushed by the Arab states
they fled to the last wild, uncontrolled places in the region —
Lebanon's Bekaa Valley and Afghanistan — or to the freedom of
America and Europe.
Second, some Arab regimes, most of which are corrupt
dictatorships afraid of their own people, made a devil's pact with
the fundamentalists. They allowed the Islamists' domestic supporters
to continue raising money, ostensibly for Muslim welfare groups, and
to funnel it to the Osama bin Ladens — on the condition that the
Islamic extremists not attack these regimes. The Saudis in
particular struck that bargain.
Third, these Arab regimes, feeling defensive about their Islamic
crackdowns, allowed their own press and intellectuals total freedom
to attack America and Israel, as a way of deflecting criticism from
themselves.
As a result, a generation of Muslims and Arabs have been raised
on such distorted views of America that despite the fact that
America gives Egypt $2 billion a year, despite the fact that America
fought for the freedom of Muslims in Kuwait, Bosnia and Kosovo, and
despite the fact that Bill Clinton met with Yasir Arafat more than
with any other foreign leader, America has been vilified as the
biggest enemy of Islam. And that is one reason that many people in
the Arab-Muslim world today have either applauded the attack on
America or will tell you — with a straight face — that it was all a
C.I.A.-Mossad plot to embarrass the Muslim world.
We need the moderate Arab states as our partners — but we don't
need only their intelligence. We need them to be intelligent. I
don't expect them to order their press to say nice things about
America or Israel. They are entitled to their views on both, and
both at times deserve criticism. But what they have never encouraged
at all is for anyone to consistently present an alternative,
positive view of America — even though they were sending their kids
here to be educated. Anyone who did would be immediately branded a
C.I.A. agent.
And while the Arab states have crushed their Islamic terrorists,
they have never confronted them ideologically and delegitimized
their behavior as un-Islamic. Arab and Muslim Americans are not part
of this problem. But they could be an important part of the solution
by engaging in the debate back in the Arab world, and presenting
another vision of America.
So America's standing in the Arab-Muslim world is now very low —
partly because we have not told our story well, partly because of
policies we have adopted and partly because inept, barely legitimate
Arab leaders have deliberately deflected domestic criticism of
themselves onto us. The result: We must now fight a war against
terrorists who are crazy and evil but who, it grieves me to say,
reflect the mood in their home countries more than we might think.