Victory for Spies

By Patrick Seale

15 November 2001

 

 

Throughout the boom years of the 1990s, when stock markets soared and growth in the American economy seemed unstoppable, every ambitious young American wanted to be an investment banker. Today, espionage is the fashionable profession.

Since the terrorist attacks of 11 September, thousands of young people have rushed to join the CIA and America’s twelve other intelligence agencies. A  crash recruitment drive is underway. Speakers of Arabic, Turkish, Farsi, Pushto, Dari and Urdu are in great demand, while a knowledge of Chinese or Russian is also considered a distinct advantage for any would-be secret agent. Humint – that is to say intelligence derived from human sources rather than from satellites or from electronic eavesdropping – is being given top priority.

Intelligence services are not the only ones to be expanding fast to meet the new ‘asymetrical’ threat from international terrorism. In most major countries, Special Forces are looking for strong young men, with a taste for adventure.

In Afghanistan, British and American Special Forces made a crucial, if largely unpublicized, contribution to this week’s victorious advance of the Northern Alliance. The reason Kabul was captured virtually without opposition was because small teams of Special Forces on the ground were able to direct devastatingly accurate air strikes at Taleban troops, forcing them to disperse. Unable to concentrate their forces, the Taliban could not make a stand.

Both the United States and Britain have admitted that their Special Forces  helped to coordinate the ground attack of the Northern Alliance forces with the air bombardment of the Taliban.

The capture of airfields inside Afghanistan, such as the Bagram air base north of Kabul, is further bad news for the Taliban. Once American ground attack aircraft start operating from these airstrips, they will be able, with help from Special Forces deep in Afghanistan, to give even more support to anti-Taliban troops.

Without air cover and unable to concentrate their forces for a counter-attack, the Taliban must now resort to guerrilla warfare -- if they decide to fight on. The conventional war in Afghanistan is virtually over.

 

See 2/

Where is Bin Laden?

Intelligence agents and Special Forces still have plenty of work to do. They need to find answers to some basic questions. Where is Osama bin Laden? What are his plans? Can Al-Qa’ida hit back? Where is Mullah Muhammad Omar? If Bin Laden and Mullah Omar are both eliminated, who will succeed them? Are there more ‘Bin Ladens’ hiding out there in the mountains of Afghanistan?

More than ever, intelligence is now the essential ingredient of international politics. George W Bush’s ‘coalition against terror’ is largely based on the sharing of intelligence about terrorist groups, with the US benefiting from help from Britain, but also from Russia and Pakistan, both of whom know Afghanistan well.

Big powers are striking deals over intelligence. It may be that President Vladimir Putin was persuaded to shut down Russia’s big electronic interception station in Cuba, targeted at the United States, because of a new US-Russian agreement to share intelligence about terrorists.

Worried about security and anxious to calm the fears of the public, political leaders have woken up to the importance of intelligence. In the US, George Tenet, the Director of Central Intelligence is to be given full Cabinet rank – if, that is, he keeps his job. To advise him on security matters, President Jacques Chirac of France has chosen Philippe Massoni, a man with a long career in intelligence who served for eight years as chief of the Paris police. Before siding with the United States against the Taliban, President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan first removed from his post General Mahmud Ahmad, head of the powerful Inter-Service Intelligence (ISI), which had been the Taliban’s main external support.

In Saudi Arabia, Crown Prince Abdallah has replaced Prince Turki al-Faisal, the Kingdom’s long-serving Intelligence chief, with one of his own brothers, Prince Nawaf bin Abdulaziz. US Secretary of State Colin Powell has appointed the former CENTCOM commander, Admiral Anthony Zinni, as his adviser on security and intelligence matters. General Muhamad Fahim, the Northern Alliance defence minister who made a triumphal entry into Kabul this week, was head of intelligence for Ahmad Shah Masood, when Masood was fighting the Russian occupation in the 1980s.

The pattern is everywhere the same: intelligence has come into its own and policy makers and political leaders want close personal ties with the intelligence agencies.

Intelligence is vital to support military operations abroad, as in the war against the Taliban, but it is also vital to protect the home front against terrorist attack.

Who is to blame?

In the United States, the hunt is on – and the knives are out -- to establish who is to blame for the failure to prevent the 11 September attacks. It has been called the ‘Pearl Harbour of the intelligence agencies’. Congress has called for an investigation and the various intelligence agencies are already blaming each other.

America’s giant ‘Intelligence Community’ costs the taxpayer about $30bn a year – or about 10% of the US defense budget of well over $300bn. No other country in the world comes anywhere near spending such a vast amount on intelligence. The American intelligence budget is some 12 to 15 times bigger than the British or French intelligence budgets.

Who are the big spenders?

*** The CIA employs 17,000 people in the collection and analysis of information and has a budget of $3.5bn. Congress has just given it another $700m in emergency funds.

*** These sums are dwarfed by the Defense Intelligence Agency, which has a budget of $14bn, for the collection of both strategic and tactical intelligence. It has just been given a further $1.2bn.

*** The National Reconnaissance Office develops, builds and manages intelligence satellite systems with a budget of over $6bn.

*** As its name suggests, The National Imagery and Mapping Agency handles imagery intelligence systems and mapping.

***The National Security Agency intercepts and monitors world-wide communications, employs 38,000 people and has a budget of about $4bn.

 *** The Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) is America’s main agency in the war against organized crime. Its main task is to fight the mafia, drug barons and other gangsters and criminals. Its traditional concern has been with law-enforcement. But 7,000 of its agents and other employees have now been diverted to the investigation of the 11 September attacks and the anthrax mailings.

A major result of the terrorist attacks is that the old frontier between foreign intelligence and domestic law-enforcement has become blurred. The two now need to be closely integrated in the battle against terrorism – but this involves overcoming ancient feuds between the various intelligence agencies which often treat each other like rivals, even like enemies, rather than partners.

 

Reforming the agencies

This month President Bush will receive a report from General Brent Scowcroft, chairman of the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, recommending a radical overhaul of the US intelligence community.

The report has been drafted by a special commission set up by President Bush last May, but its work has been given new urgency by the 11 September attacks.

According to press reports, General Scowcroft’s main proposals are expected to strengthen the role and powers of the Director of Central Intelligence, the President’s chief intelligence officer and manager of the intelligence community. The CIA will be given a bigger budget, its Director will have full Cabinet rank and, to ensure continuity, he is likely to be appointed for a 10-year term like the FBI director.

As mentioned above, George Tenet is likely to be replaced by a powerful professional figure of proven ability, who has the support of both Republicans and Democrats.

A controversial proposal is for the CIA to take over from the Defense Department control over the National Reconnaissance Office, the National Imagery and Mapping Agency, and the National Security Agency.

These changes will not be approved without a fight. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld is known to oppose them, as do the Senate and House Armed Services Committees. Where power and multi-billion dollar budgets are concerned, change in Washington does not come easily.

The FBI also faces sweeping changes. Attorney General John Ashcroft and FBI director Robert Mueller have put the Justice Department and the FBI on a ‘war footing’, switching their prime focus from domestic crimes to terrorist threats.

One thing is certain. The fight against terrorism is now America’s top priority. Spies can celebrate. One way or the other, money and influence are coming their way.