Media Monitors Network

.....where truth prevails

Posted: October 13, 2002

Toll-free: 1 866 MediaNet

E-mail: Editor@MediaMonitors.net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

Perspective

 
To look at Iraq in the light of 9/11 - or at 9/11 in the light of war on Iraq?

by John-Paul Leonard

Yesterday the Christian Science Monitor let the cat have a peek out of the bag when they wrote: "Bush's speech Monday reveals how much America, not Hussein, has changed... The Bush administration ... is focusing not so much on new charges as on old information presented in a new context... 'On Sept. 11, 2001, America felt its vulnerability even to threats that gather on the other side of the earth," said President Bush on Monday.' " [1]

In other words, no news on the Iraq front. All Bush has to push for war is September 11. That was all we had to go on for the invasion of Afghanistan, too (waged for a UNOCAL president and pipeline there, and the greater glory and profit of the Bush family's Carlyle Group and Cheney's Halliburton).

On Iraq, the Monitor summarized, "It isn't President Hussein that has changed. It is us." Who had an interest to engineer a change in us?

There is an immense, and immensely disturbing body of evidence of self-terror on 9/11 - all over the Internet, and in a recently released book, The War on Freedom.[2] Despite the apparent 9/11-Taliban link, the US Army let perennial scapegoat bin Laden escape again. Of course, Osama collaborated with the CIA during the Soviet-Afghan war, and the bin Laden family have deep and longstanding business ties with the Bushes in the Carlyle Group. Right after Sept. 11, when all other air flights were grounded, a special charter flight whisked the bin Ladens out of the US. On the morning of Sept. 11 itself, Pakistani general Mahmud Ahmed, who transferred $100,000 to Mohamed Atta through a bagman linked to the CIA, was sitting with the congressional CIA committee chairmen, who now head the commission to investigate "intelligence failure" on 9/11. Not one person in the FAA or Pentagon has been disciplined for failing to follow standard procedures and intercept the hijacked Boeings.

How is it that option trades on airline shares, made with clear foreknowledge of 911, were traced not to Al-Qaeda, but to the AB Brown bank, with very strong CIA links (and even a historical link to the Bushes, through their family bank Brown Bros. Harriman) - but then ignored? There are literally dozens of such unexplained issues.

And as for the other recent change in Afghanistan: the opium harvest is back up to pre-Taliban levels. Is that also what the war was about? Is it coincidence that Bush and Cheney are members of a Yale fraternity that was founded on the opium trade to China? Or that Bush and Cheney started taking the anthrax antidote Cipro on Sept. 11, a month before the anthrax scare was public?

The administration attempt to pin the anthrax attacks on Iraq failed miserably. Yet when it became clear the source came from our own US Army, the investigation went nowhere. The C.S. Monitor, among others, has documented how Bush Sr. used lies to get allied support for the first Gulf War - a non-existent tank buildup on the Saudi border, and the imaginary incubator baby atrocity. [3]

So all Bush has to go on against Iraq is 9/11 - but he has shown no link between 9/11 and Iraq, despite many attempts to fabricate one. Let us look now at those clear links implicating the Bush coterie in 9/11, in arranging a pretext for war, as the cunning tactic of a clique of private-sector militarists.

It is also none too soon to look at the eagerness of the Bushes to decimate Iraq's civilian population, in light of the origins of the Bush family political and commercial fortune: the financing of Hitler's rise to power by Prescott Bush and associates, his payoff in Auschwitz slave labor for the Thyssen-Flick steel works there, which he personally managed, [4] and which financed the Bush family's political careers - a blood money scandal which, incredibly, has been suppressed throughout the election campaigns of all three generations of Bushes.

When the Reichstag burned and the Bush-Thyssen protegé Hitler seized power, America had already gone to war twice on what were assuredly acts of self-terror: the sinking of the Maine and the Lusitania. Strange? Not at all. After all, America first introduced bio-weapons to Iraq, and nuclear ones to the world.

Note:

[1] "Why US won't give way on Iraq," http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/1009/p01s02-usgn.html

[2] http://www.thewaronfreedom.com/

[3] "In war, some facts less factual",  http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0906/p01s02-wosc.html

[4] "Heir to the Holocaust. Prescott Bush, 1.5 Million Dollars, and Auschwitz: How the Bush Family Wealth is Linked to the Jewish Holocaust," by Toby Rogers, Clamor Magazine. Based on an interview with John Loftus, president of the Florida Holocaust Museum.  http://www.clamormagazine.org/features/issue14.3_feature.html

Mr. John-Paul Leonard is a free-lance writer and a regular contributor to Media Monitors Network (MMN)

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Sign Mr. John-Paul Leonard's

Appeal to UN Security Council to Halt Naked Aggression

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Buy the related book (s) now:

The War on Freedom - How and Why America was Attacked, September 11th 2001 - by Nafeez Msaddeq Ahmed

Source:
 
by courtesy & © 2002 John-Paul Leonard

by the same author:

Response to Dr. Mathis
                                 More in 'Perspective'..
 
  Copyright © 2002 Media Monitors Network. All rights reserved.  
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
 

Back to Top 

 
 
 

SUPPORT MMN

MMN SERVICES

 
  Recent Content

 
 
 
 
COMMENTS

News

 
   

Today's Feature

 

Content Needed On

 
 
 

Volunteer for MMN