![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]()
![]() |
Revealed: US dirty tricks to win vote on Iraq war Secret document details American plan to bug phones and emails of key Security Council members Read the memo Talk about it: dirty tricks? Martin Bright, Ed Vulliamy in New York and Peter Beaumont Sunday March 2, 2003 The Observer The United States is conducting a secret 'dirty tricks' campaign against UN Security Council delegations in New York as part of its battle to win votes in favour of war against Iraq. Details of the aggressive surveillance operation, which involves interception of the home and office telephones and the emails of UN delegates in New York, are revealed in a document leaked to The Observer. The disclosures were made in a memorandum written by a top official at the National Security Agency - the US body which intercepts communications around the world - and circulated to both senior agents in his organisation and to a friendly foreign intelligence agency asking for its input. The memo describes orders to staff at the agency, whose work is clouded in secrecy, to step up its surveillance operations 'particularly directed at... UN Security Council Members (minus US and GBR, of course)' to provide up-to-the-minute intelligence for Bush officials on the voting intentions of UN members regarding the issue of Iraq. The leaked memorandum makes clear that the target of the heightened surveillance efforts are the delegations from Angola, Cameroon, Chile, Mexico, Guinea and Pakistan at the UN headquarters in New York - the so-called 'Middle Six' delegations whose votes are being fought over by the pro-war party, led by the US and Britain, and the party arguing for more time for UN inspections, led by France, China and Russia. The memo is directed at senior NSA officials and advises them that the agency is 'mounting a surge' aimed at gleaning information not only on how delegations on the Security Council will vote on any second resolution on Iraq, but also 'policies', 'negotiating positions', 'alliances' and 'dependencies' - the 'whole gamut of information that could give US policymakers an edge in obtaining results favourable to US goals or to head off surprises'. Dated 31 January 2003, the memo was circulated four days after the UN's chief weapons inspector Hans Blix produced his interim report on Iraqi compliance with UN resolution 1441. It was sent by Frank Koza, chief of staff in the 'Regional Targets' section of the NSA, which spies on countries that are viewed as strategically important for United States interests. Koza specifies that the information will be used for the US's 'QRC' - Quick Response Capability - 'against' the key delegations. Suggesting the levels of surveillance of both the office and home phones of UN delegation members, Koza also asks regional managers to make sure that their staff also 'pay attention to existing non-UN Security Council Member UN-related and domestic comms [office and home telephones] for anything useful related to Security Council deliberations'. Koza also addresses himself to the foreign agency, saying: 'We'd appreciate your support in getting the word to your analysts who might have similar more indirect access to valuable information from accesses in your product lines [ie, intelligence sources].' Koza makes clear it is an informal request at this juncture, but adds: 'I suspect that you'll be hearing more along these lines in formal channels.' Disclosure of the US operation comes in the week that Blix will make what many expect to be his final report to the Security Council. It also comes amid increasingly threatening noises from the US towards undecided countries on the Security Council who have been warned of the unpleasant economic consequences of standing up to the US. Sources in Washington familiar with the operation said last week that there had been a division among Bush administration officials over whether to pursue such a high-intensity surveillance campaign with some warning of the serious consequences of discovery. The existence of the surveillance operation, understood to have been requested by President Bush's National Security Adviser, Condoleezza Rice, is deeply embarrassing to the Americans in the middle of their efforts to win over the undecided delegations. The language and content of the memo were judged to be authentic by three former intelligence operatives shown it by The Observer. We were also able to establish that Frank Koza does work for the NSA and could confirm his senior post in the Regional Targets section of the organisation. The NSA main switchboard put The Observer through to extension 6727 at the agency which was answered by an assistant, who confirmed it was Koza's office. However, when The Observer asked to talk to Koza about the surveillance of diplomatic missions at the United Nations, it was then told 'You have reached the wrong number'. On protesting that the assistant had just said this was Koza's extension, the assistant repeated that it was an erroneous extension, and hung up. While many diplomats at the UN assume they are being bugged, the memo reveals for the first time the scope and scale of US communications intercepts targeted against the New York-based missions. The disclosure comes at a time when diplomats from the countries have been complaining about the outright 'hostility' of US tactics in recent days to persuade then to fall in line, including threats to economic and aid packages. The operation appears to have been spotted by rival organisations in Europe. 'The Americans are being very purposeful about this,' said a source at a European intelligence agency when asked about the US surveillance efforts. Special reports Iraq crisis: Observer special Special report: Iraq Special report: the anti-war movement Observer Worldview Exclusive: UN dirty tricks 02.03.2003: Revealed: US dirty tricks to win vote on Iraq war 02.03.2003: Bugging plan: read the US memo Talk: US dirty tricks In Iraq 02.03.2003: Iraq destroys missiles in last-ditch bid to avoid war 02.03.2003: Kurds in fear of Turkish motives The UN divided 02.03.2003: Focus: America the arm-twister 02.03.2003: Profile: Jacques the juggler 02.03.2003: The diplomatic gridlock 02.03.2003: Nick Taylor: Guinea's moment of fame 02.03.2003: Weekly briefing High drama at Westminster 02.03.2003: Focus: Blair's high wire act 02.03.2003: Win or bust for Blair Special report: Parliamentary debate in full Guardian Unlimited Politics After the vote 02.03.2003: Andrew Rawnsley: Journey into the unknown 02.03.2003: Michael Portillo: Labour won't forgive 02.03.2003: Roy Hattersley: The days of obedience are over 02.03.2003: Mary Warnock: Any war demands morality Iraq crisis: Observer Comment 02.03.2003: Leader: Blair must win the argument 02.03.2003: Nick Cohen: The only way to peace 02.03.2003: Peter Preston: Balance will be the first casualty 02.03.2003: Terry Jones: Tony Blair and the hawks 02.03.2003: Rosemary Hollis: A diplomatic solution? 02.03.2003: Business focus: Attacking the state 02.03.2003: Bulent Yusuf: Global press week mailto:debate@observer.co.uk The Business of War 02.03.2003: The first privatised war 02.03.2003: Firms with friends in high places 02.03.2003: OK, who forgot the toilet rolls? 02.02.2003: Vincent Cable: The economic consequences of war Terror threat 02.03.2003: Top 9/11 suspect seized in Pakistan 02.03.2003: Saudi envoy in UK linked to 9/11 War on Terrorism: Observer special Iraq after Saddam 23.02.2003: Val Percival: Lessons from Kosovo 16.02.2003: Iraqi opposition slams plan for military governor 16.02.2003: Kanan Makiya: Our hopes betrayed Talk: Iraq's democrats betrayed? 09.02.2003: Focus: The Iraq Bush will build 09.02.2003: Robert L Barry: The next Yugoslavia? Observer highlights: the broadest debate 19.01.2003: Leader: Why force may be needed Talk: Where do you stand on Iraq? 16.02.2003: Andrew Rawnsley: It's do or die, Prime Minister 16.02.2003: Tony Blair: The price of my conviction 09.02.2003: Mary Riddell: With Bible and bombs 16.02.2003: Nick Cohen: The Left isn't listening 23.02.2003: William Shawcross: Why Saddam will never disarm 16.02.2003: Dan Plesch: Disarm Saddam without war 23.02.2003: Focus: Twilight of a tyrant 16.02.2003: Focus: Worlds apart on war 16.02.2003: Henry Porter: One rule for Israel, another for Saddam 26.01.2003: Charles Kennedy: We're being bulldozed into war 16.02.2003: Leader: We must not rule out war 09.02.2003: Leader: The dossier that shamed Britain 26.01.2003: Letters: What you say about our stand on Iraq 16.02.2003: Mary Riddell: The great unheard finally speak out 09.02.2003: Jason Burke: Powell doesn't know who he is up against 02.02.2003: David Aaronovitch: Why the Left is wrong on Saddam 16.02.2003: Anthony Sampson: Why Britain's war? 09.02.2003: Jason Burke: The missing link? 19.01.2003: Debate: What prominent Britons think 02.02.2003: Gil Loescher: The refugee crisis 26.01.2003: Mary Riddell: Don't disdain the doves 26.01.2003: Terry Jones: My neighbour trouble 05.01.2003: Nick Cohen: Saddam won't run 14.07.2002: John Pilger: The great charade 29.12.2002: Ken Nichols: Back to Iraq as a human shield 15.09.2002: Jason Burke: Return to Kurdistan 01.09.2002: Dilip Hiro: US blind eye to poison gas 11.08.2002: Nick Cohen: Who will save Iraq? 04.08.2002: Richard Harries: Not a just war 25.08.2002: Christopher Hitchens: With friends like these 22.09.2002: Terry Jones: The audacious courage of Mr Blair 22.09.2002: Rosemary Hollis: Hawks won't stop with Baghdad 11.08.2002: Mark Leonard: Could the left back war? 17.03.2002: John Lloyd: Anti-Americanism betrays the left 17.02.2002: Terry Jones: George's friendly bombs 02.12.2001: David Rose: The doves are wrong - again Special reports Iraq: Observer special Observer Worldview Afghanistan Terrorism crisis Islam and the West More global commentary More from Peter Beaumont More from Jason Burke More from Ed Vulliamy More from Mark Leonard More from Dan Plesch Worldview highlights: debating American power Useful links UNSCOM UN resolutions on Iraq British Foreign Office: Relations with Iraq US State Department Iraq Update Arab.net - Iraq resources Campaign against Sanctions on Iraq Centre for non-proliferation studies |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |