How the war began
A chronology of Palestinian moves leading up
to the outbreak of violence two years ago shows it was planned in advance and
ignited over the Jerusalem issue
A few days after the failure of the Camp
David summit in July 2000, the Palestinian Authority's monthly magazine,
Al-Shuhada ("The Martyrs"), published the following letter on July
25: "From the negotiating delegation [At Camp David,] led by the commander
and symbol, Abu Ammar (Yasser Arafat) to the brave Palestinian people, be
prepared. The Battle for Jerusalem has begun."
The letter appeared in the aftermath of
reports emanating from Camp David suggesting that the summit had failed because
of Arafat's intransigence. According to PA sources, the letter was written by a
senior Arafat adviser and approved by the PA chairman beforehand.
The letter was published in a magazine
distributed only among PA security personnel. It did not appear in any of the
daily newspapers published in Jerusalem or Ramallah. Hence the message Arafat
was sending to his armed men was clear: "Be prepared for an all-out
confrontation with Israel, because I refuse to accept Israeli and American
dictates."
One month later - long after Arafat had
returned to Gaza - the PA's (former) police commissioner, Gen. Ghazi Jabali,
told the official Palestinian newspaper Al-Hayat al-Jadida on August 14:
"The Palestinian police will lead together with the noble sons of the
Palestinian people, when the hour of confrontation arrives."
Freih Abu Middein, the PA Justice Minister,
said he could see the writing on the wall. In an interview with the same
newspaper published on August 24, 2000, he warned: "Violence is near and
the Palestinian people are willing to sacrifice even 5,000 casualties."
The statement came after a series of meetings that Arafat had held with his
cabinet ministers.
Another official publication of the PA,
Al-Sabah ("The Morning"), on August 30, 2000, echoed the tone of
escalation when it declared a few days later: "We will advance and declare
a general intifada for Jerusalem. The time for the intifada has arrived, the
time for jihad has arrived."
The rhetorical escalation started even before
Arafat and his entourage left Camp David. A PA official who was with Arafat
said the PA Chairman was furious with Israel and the US because they had
accused him of being responsible for the botched summit. He felt that both
prime minister Ehud Barak and US president Bill Clinton were now seeking to
isolate him by declaring that the Palestinian people deserved a better
leadership.
Upon his return from Camp David, Arafat
received a hero's welcome from his people because he was being portrayed as the
Arab and Muslim leader who refused to compromise on their historic, national
and religious rights. Public-opinion polls showed a dramatic rise in his
popularity, and even his secular and religious rivals were now heaping praise
on him for not compromising. Arafat told well-wishers who came to see him in
Ramallah that he refused to become [Egyptian president Anwar] "Sadat No.
2," who was denounced by many Arabs for signing a separate peace treaty
with Israel.
"Welcome Arafat - the hero of war and
hero of peace," said one banner in the streets of Gaza as Arafat's
motorcade made its way from the local airport to his office. Another read:
"Jerusalem is in our eyes, tomorrow it will be in our hands."
Earlier in the day, hundreds of Palestinians
marched in the city demanding a return to the intifada against Israel. Buoyed
by the failure of Camp David, Hamas and the Islamic Jihad issued statements
urging Arafat to abandon the peace talks with Israel and return to the armed
struggle.
The two radical Islamic groups regarded the
breakdown of Camp David as further evidence that Israel was not serious about
reaching a just and comprehensive peace with the Palestinians. Their spokesmen
also told Arafat that if the summit proved anything, it was the fact that the
US remains fully biased toward Israel.
After the failure of Camp David, Arafat
visited almost all the Arab states, except for Syria and Iraq, asking their
leaders for their support for his position. He also visited a number of
European countries in an effort to explain his stance.
"Jerusalem and its holy sites,
especially al-Aksa mosque, belong to one billion Muslims and I don't have the
right to give them up to anyone," he reportedly told the Arab kings and
presidents.
The Arab leaders assured Arafat that they
stand behind him, but his tour of other world capitals after Camp David
highlighted the fact that, for the first time in years, international
sympathies were now on the side of Israel. For Arafat, this signaled the
beginning of his isolation in the international arena.
For nearly three decades the PLO leader
became accustomed to receiving a red-carpet welcome by kings and heads of state
all over the world. He also became used to hearing sympathetic words for him
and the cause he represents from his hosts. Now things were beginning to look
different for Arafat in the West.
US assistant secretary of state Edward Walker
was dispatched on a 14-stop regional tour in a last-minute attempt to persuade
its Arab allies to withdraw their support for Arafat's position, but by then it
was too late.
AS the pressure on him mounted, Arafat became
even more defiant when he declared that he would go ahead with plans to
announce the creation of the State of Palestine on September 13, 2000. In an
interview with a Saudi newspaper on August 1, Arafat said: "There is no
retreat on the fixed timetable of the declaration of the state. It will be
declared on the fixed time which is September 13, God willing, regardless of
those who agree or disagree."
Almost all the Arab states gave Arafat their
blessing for the state idea. The PA chairman also received a commitment of
diplomatic recognition from South African President Thabo Mbeki, whose country
then had a big impact on the decisions of many other Third World states. Arafat
was so confident that he would obtain widespread support that he ordered the PA
Ministry of Planning and International Cooperation to start training
Palestinians for diplomatic jobs overseas.
But on September 10 Arafat and the central
committee of the PLO were forced to postpone, yet again, the planned declaration
of statehood. The decision only increased the sense of bitterness among top PA
officials who accused the US of blindly backing Israel and misleading the rest
of the world on the reasons for the failure of the Camp David summit.
In conjunction with the political offensive,
which began almost immediately after Camp David, the PA was also preparing for
a possible military confrontation with Israel. PA security officials
interviewed in the local media openly talked about a looming armed confrontation.
Some even warned that the PA areas would be turned into a "graveyard"
for the IDF if Israel decided to reoccupy the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Their
statements came in response to remarks made by former IDF chief of General
Staff Shaul Mofaz, who warned that Israel would use tanks and jets if the
Palestinians launched an armed offensive.
According to reports from Gaza in mid-August,
some of the PA's paramilitary forces were holding battalion-level training
exercises.
Moreover, many senior PA security officers
were being sent to attend military training courses in countries such as Egypt,
Yemen, Algeria and Pakistan. On the ground, Palestinians started feeling the
tension when members of Force 17, Arafat's elite presidential guard, were seen
digging trenches and heavily reinforcing their positions with sandbags. Within
days, most of the PA police stations and bases looked like military fortresses.
As the Camp David summit was under way,
Arafat's Fatah organization, the biggest faction of the PLO, started training
Palestinian teenagers for the upcoming violence in 40 training camps throughout
the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
Some PA officials and newspaper commentators
also started calling for the adoption of the Hizbullah strategy, which, they
believed, led to the withdrawal of the IDF from southern Lebanon a few months
earlier. Hizbullah leaders, including secretary-general Hassan Nasrallah,
appeared on Arab satellite television networks to mock Arafat and his
negotiators, arguing that Palestine could be liberated only through the use of
force, and not at summits like the one held in Camp David.
BY NOW the atmosphere in the Palestinian
street was one of "the eve of war." PA ministers and representatives
stepped up their criticism of Israel and the US as part of the PA's efforts to
refute accusations that it was responsible for the collapse of the Camp David
talks and that the Palestinians had missed yet another historic opportunity.
PA-appointed imams in West Bank and Gaza
Strip mosques began referring to Israel as "the Zionist enemy" and
urged all Muslims to mobilize for the war against the "infidels." In
the words of one Gazan preacher, "All weapons must be aimed at the Jews,
at the enemies of Allah, the cursed nation in the Koran, whom the Koran
describes as monkeys and pigs, worshipers of the calf and idol
worshipers."
Other imams spoke of the need and duty to
liberate Palestine from the Zionist aggressors. This time the talk was not only
about liberating the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Now the demand was for
Jerusalem, Jaffa, Haifa and Ashkelon.
Israel was also being accused of distributing
drugs among young Palestinian men and women in order to corrupt them and bring
about the disintegration of Palestinian society. In addition to the drugs, the
Israelis were also believed to be behind sexually-arousing chewing gum found in
Palestinian shops. The alleged goal: to turn Palestinian women into
prostitutes.
As the tensions intensified, PA officials
this time accused Israel of spreading "radioactive belts" that cause
cancer.
An August 3 poll conducted by the independent
Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research indicated that two-thirds of
Palestinians supported a new intifada against Israel. This was the first time
since the signing of the Oslo Accords that a majority of Palestinians said they
supported violence against Israel.
In an attempt to avoid the inevitable clash,
senior Israeli and Palestinian officials, including PA Secretary-General Tayeb
Abdel Rahim and Israeli Deputy Defense Minister Ephraim Sneh met to reduce
tensions and prevent the outbreak of violence following the breakdown of the
Camp David talks. The meetings were authorized by Arafat under pressure from
Washington.
More than a year later, on the first
anniversary of the intifada, West Bank Fatah leader Marwan Barghouti gave an
interview on October 22 to the London-based Arabic newspaper al-Sharq al-Awsat
in which he admitted that he had played a direct role in igniting the intifada.
He said: "I knew that the end of
September was the last period [of time] before the explosion, but when Sharon
reached al-Aksa Mosque, this was the most appropriate moment for the outbreak
of the intifada... The night prior to Sharon's visit, I participated in a panel
on a local television station and I seized the opportunity to call on the
public to go to al-Aksa Mosque in the morning, for it was not possible that
Sharon would reach al-Haram al-Sharif [the Temple Mount] just so, and walk away
peacefully. I finished and went to al-Aksa in the morning.... We tried to
create clashes without success because of the differences of opinion that
emerged with others in al-Aksa compound at the time.... After Sharon left, I
remained for two hours in the presence of other people, we discussed the manner
of response and how it was possible to react in all the cities and not just in
Jerusalem. We contacted all [the Palestinian] factions."
Barghouti traveled to the Triangle area
inside Israel later that day where he was to participate in a conference. He
explained: "While we were in the car on the way to the Triangle, I
prepared a leaflet in the name of the Higher Committee of Fatah, coordinated
with the brothers [e.g., Hamas], in which we called for a reaction to what
happened in Jerusalem."
Imad Faluji, the PA communications minister,
admitted on October 11, 2001, that the violence had been planned in July, far
in advance of Sharon's "provocation." He said: "Whoever thinks
that the intifada broke out because of the despised Sharon's visit to Al-Aksa
Mosque, is wrong, even if this visit was the straw that broke the back of the
Palestinian people. This intifada was planned in advance, ever since President
Arafat's return from the Camp David negotiations, where he turned the table
upside down on President Clinton. [Arafat] remained steadfast and challenged
[Clinton]. He rejected the American terms and he did it in the heart of the
US."
Sakher Habash, a member of Fatah's Central
Committee, said in an interview with the PA daily Al-Hayat Al-Jadida on
December 7, 2000: "After the Camp David Summit it became clear to the
Fatah movement, as brother Abu Ammar [Arafat] had warned, that the next phase
requires us to prepare for conflict [with Israel], because Prime Minister Barak
is not a partner capable of complying with our people's aspirations. In light
of this estimation, Fatah was the most prepared for a conflict among all other
[Palestinian] national movements. [At the Camp David Summit] we thought that
President Clinton would be able to put pressure on the Israeli government before
leaving the White House so that Barak would agree to a political solution
acceptable to us. But it became clear that the American position coincides with
the Israeli position: sharing sovereignty over al-Haram al-Sharif with us, and
dividing east Jerusalem into four or five parts in order to guarantee Israeli
control there.
"In light of the information, [after]
analyzing the political positions following the Camp David summit, and in
accordance with what brother Abu Ammar said, it became clear to the Fatah
movement that the next stage necessitates preparation for confrontation,
because Prime Minister Barak is not a partner who can respond to our people's
aspirations. Based on these assessments, Fatah was more prepared than the other
movements for this confrontation. In order to play the role given to it, Fatah
coordinated its administrative, civilian and sovereign apparatuses, and was not
surprised by the outbreak of the current intifada... The Fatah movement
believed that the phenomenon of comprehensive struggle would appear at the
final settlement stage."
In October, almost two months after the
intifada began, Arafat went to the Sharm e-Sheikh summit against the will of
most of the Palestinian factions and some of his cabinet ministers. PA sources
said Arafat's decision to go to the summit came largely in response to pressure
from Egypt and Saudi Arabia, which feared that the Israeli-Palestinian crisis
was spinning out of control. As far as Arafat was concerned, prime minister
Ehud Barak and his government were no longer peace partners.
As expected, the "cease-fire
agreement" reached at Sharm e-Sheikh drew fire from many Palestinians, who
believed Arafat was under immense pressure from Washington to comply. PA
officials told Palestinian journalists that Arafat's acceptance of the
agreement "was more out of courtesy for president Clinton and Egyptian
President Hosni Mubarak, who hosted the summit." Arafat himself later
denied that he made any agreement with Barak. He rejected an Israeli and American
request to call directly and personally on the Palestinians in the streets to
show restraint and restore calm. "Arafat was really offended by the
accusations that he was responsible for the failure of the Camp David
talks," explained a Palestinian negotiator. "That's why he wasn't
prepared to humiliate himself by calling for an end to the violence."
The intifada was actually the best thing that
could have happened to Arafat. It came at the right time, because it turned the
fury of the Palestinians away from the corrupt and inept regime that he had
established in 1994. Moreover, the violence united Palestinian factions against
the common enemy, Israel, and rallied the people behind Arafat's leadership. In
a sense, the intifada saved Arafat and his self-rule government because it
directed the anger and frustration towards Israel instead of the PA.
Another reason why Arafat didn't move quickly
to end the violence in the first days of the intifada is the fact that he
believed that it would enhance his position in any future peace negotiations.
Arafat hoped to use the intifada, which he expected would last for a number of
days or, at the most, a few weeks, to tell Israel and the world that this is
one of the results of the breakdown of the peace talks.
One of Arafat's conclusions following Camp
David is that the best way to extract more concessions from Israel would be to
involve more countries in the peace process. One of his main goals now was to
drag the Arab countries into the conflict with Israel. He repeatedly reminded
the Arab and Muslim countries that Jerusalem and its holy sites were their
responsibility too.
Arafat and the Palestinians were once again
greatly disappointed by the lack of support from the Arab League Summit, held
in Cairo in October 2000. There was plenty of lip-service but an unwillingness
to do anything practical on the ground.
It is now clear that the past two years of
violence were unleashed as part of a strategy to internationalize the conflict
and force Israel into making further concessions. But the violent tactics
spiraled out of control taking on a deadly momentum of their own. What remains
to be seen is whether there is a way out.
z